A comparative study to assess the effectiveness of curcumin, mucosamin, and chlorhexidine in chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis.

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis is one of the most frequent and challenging side effects of chemotherapy. At present, none of the guidelines recommend the use of various mouthwashes available for the treatment of oral mucositis. METHODS: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of curcumin, mucosamin, and chlorhexidine in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. In this randomized and double-blind study, 71 patients over 18 years, who received chemotherapy and suffered from chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis, were randomized into curcumin, mucosamin, and chlorhexidine groups. The World Health Organization (WHO) Oral Toxicity Scale, the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) were used to evaluate oral mucositis. The main endpoint included the onset of complete recovery after starting the treatment. FINDINGS: Based on the WHO, OMAS for erythema, and NRS criteria, complete recovery was achieved from the third day in the curcumin group, which was significantly earlier compared to the other two groups (P < 0.05). The OMAS score for ulceration represented an improvement from day 5 in the curcumin group, which was significantly faster compared to the other two groups (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that all three approaches were effective in improving oral mucositis; however, curcumin could result in faster recovery in comparison with mucosamin and chlorhexidine. The use of curcumin in the treatment of oral mucositis appears to be a viable intervention for reducing potential compromise to treatment and improving the quality of life.

Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Positive Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated with Erlotinib.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) such as erlotinib and gefitinib have shown promising efficacy and tolerability in patients with advanced NSCLC. Identifying subgroups of patients who benefit from EGFR-TKI treatment may help achieve better treatment responses. Therefore, this study was performed to evaluate the indicators of response to treatment, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients. Methods: The study was performed as a prospective cohort in patients referred to Hazrat Rasoul Akram Hospital in Tehran for two years (April 2019-April 2021). Erlotinib was administered to patients at 100-150 mg daily. After completion or discontinuation of erlotinib, patients were followed up every three months to evaluate clinical outcomes. Independent t-test or Man-Whitney test was used to compare quantitative variables, chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to compare qualitative variables, and correlation test was used to determine the relationship between quantitative data. Analysis of overall survival and progression-free survival was performed using the Kaplan-Meier test. Significant levels less than 0.05 were considered. Results: Thirty-two patients participated in the final analysis. Out of 32patients, 21 (65.6%) were female, and 11 (34.4%) were male. The mean age was 59.12±14.17years (32-89years). The mean PFS was 11.44±9.35months and, the OS of patients was 21.78±14.35months. Of the 32 patients, 4 (12.5%) had a history of smoking and, the rest had no history of smoking. Conclusion: Finally, according to the findings of the present study, the use of erlotinib can be considered as an effective first-line treatment option with controllable toxicity in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC with positive EGFR. In addition, metastatic progression asymptomatic disease has been identified as the predominant pattern of disease progression. It can be stated that smoking history can play a risk factor in reducing PFS time.

Unusual complication of aluminum phosphide poisoning: Development of hemolysis and methemoglobinemia and its successful treatment.

Methemoglobinemia and hemolysis are rare findings following phosphine poisoning. In this paper, a case of aluminum phosphide (AlP) poisoning complicated by methemoglobinemia and hemolysis with a successful treatment is reported. A 28-year-old male patient presented following intentional ingestion of an AlP tablet. In this case, hematuria, hemolysis and methemoglobinemia were significant events. A methemoglobin level of 46% was detected by CO-oximetry. The patient was treated with ascorbic acid and methylene blue and he also received supportive care. Two weeks after admission, the patient was discharged from the hospital. Hemolysis and methemoglobinemia may complicate the course of phosphine poisoning.